EDITOR BOARD MEMBERS : VIEW ALL
Dr Bikasih Thapa & Dr Maheswar Prasad (Nepal) - Hideo Wada MD PhD (japan) - Dr a Lavra Castrocatesana (Mexico) - Dr Mrs N.M. Hettiarachechui (Srilanka) - Dr Jorge Aldrete Velasco (Mexico) - Prof Hans Peter Kohler (Switzerland) - Dr Hermanus Suhartono S Sp.OG(K) PhD - Dr Isabel Pinheiro (Portugal) - Dr Suranga (Srilanka) - Jovia Dino Jansen Amsterdam,Holand - Hideo Wada MD PhD University Graduate School of Medicine Departement of Moleculer and Laboratory Medicine Japan - DR Bikash Thapa Internal Medicine Nepal University - DR Maheswar Prasad Internal Medicine Nepal University - Dr a Lavra Castro Castresana Colegio de Medicina interna de Mexico - Dr Suransa Manilgama University of Srilanka Internal Departement Medicine - Dr Mrs N.M. Hettiarachechui University of Medicine Srilanka - Dr Jorge Aldrete Velaso .Colegio de Medicina Interna de Mexico - Prof Hans Peter Kholer M.D FACD Profesor of Medicine University ot Switzerland - Dr Ramezan Ali Atace . Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Departement of Micrology Tehran Iran - Ezekiel Wong Toh Yoon Dr. Gastroenterology of Japan - D Eric Beck,MD Bethesda Hospital Capitol Boelevard St Paul USA - Dr Emine Guderen Sahin Istambul University of Internal Medicine Turky - Dr Selmin Toplan Istambul University - Dr Nicholas New Australia - Dr Kughan Govinden. Tropical Infection of Internal Medicine Malaysia - Dr Godfrey M Rwegerera Princes Marina Hospital Bostwana -
COMPARING THE SUCCESS RATE AND COMPLICATIONS OF TREATING KIDNEY STONE BY PERCOTANEUS STANDARD AND TUBELESS NEOPROLITHOTOMY

Author : Seyed Habibollah Mousavi Bahar (MD), Shahriar Amirhassani (MD), Abbas Moradi (MSc), Nikan Zerafatjou(MD), Mahmoud Ebrahimi (MD)*

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is one of the methods used to treat urinary stones which may be performed by standard or tubeless method. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of percotaneus standard neoprolithotomy and tubeless neoprolithotomy in the treatment of renal stones. Methods: In this clinical trial, 107 kidney stone patients referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital of Hamedan were randomly assigned to underwent percutaneous standard neoprolithotomy or tubeless neoprolithotomy. Success rates and postoperative complications were measured and compared in two groups. Results: All 107 patients who entered into the study completed the study. The mean score of postoperative pain in patients undergoing percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and tubeless technique was 1.72 ± 5.72 and 4.12 ± 2.22, respectively (P <0.001). The severity of pain, the frequency of need for opioid, and the average amount of injected opioids in tubeless method were significantly lower than the standard method (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between two surgical methods in terms of frequency of blood transfusion, the levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit and creatinine, as well as the rate of postoperative hematoma (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that two methods of percotanous nephrolithotomy and tubeless techniques have similar success in treatment of urinary stones, but the severity of pain and the average amount of opioid consumed is more in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy than in tubless method.

[ PDF ]

 

Indexing

;;;;;;;;

 

PENGUNJUNG KAMI DARI BERBAGAI BELAHAN DUNIA

Flag Counter